menu1 manu2
bannergifinrootfolder

 

 

Support the Beacon Hill Institute with an online donation!


New-SU-Logo

 
Join BHI and Atlas Network on May 18 to hear Armando Regil of the Agora Institute for Strategic Thinking in Mexico City (IPEA)


2
Armando Regil is the Founding President of the IPEA, Institute of Strategic Thinking Agora, a think-tank of young people in Mexico that generates private solutions to public problems and public policies to ensure that Mexico becomes free, united and prosperous. Armando participated in the 16th and 17th Roundtable with the Government of Mexico organized by the Economist. In Washington DC, he worked at the Center for Global Liberty and Prosperity, and at the Cato Institute. Armando has given lectures for more than 10,000 spectators in the U.S. and Latin America. 

Register for the event here.


HeadingsWeb62004HOLDSontheissue.gif

Response to the Natural Resources Defense Council's critique of BHI's study of EPA Clean Power Program

Laurie Johnson, an economist at the Natural Resources Defense Council, recently posted a blog entry that sharply criticizes recent BHI studies of the EPA’s Clean Power Plan. It is important, in reading this blog, to understand that Dr. Johnson’s job is to defend tooth-and-nail an organization whose purpose is to promote what it deems to be environmental protection at any cost to economic activity at home and abroad. Read the complete BHI response.

Massachusetts State Tax Revenue Forecast

BHI releases State Tax Revenue Forecasts for Massachusetts Legislature

BHI predicts that tax revenues will be:

• $24,512 billion in FY 2015, 4.9% over FY 2014, and
• $25,801 billion in FY 2016, 5.3% over FY 2015.

Complete Estimate in PDF


New Hampshire electricity customers will face higher bills due to renewable mandate

(Boston, MA) Ratepayers in New Hampshire can expect to pay higher prices for electricity in the future thanks to renewable energy mandates that have little effect on greenhouse gas emissions. Industrial users will be especially hard hit. This is the finding of a new study from the Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University in Boston.

Press release (PDF)

Full study (PDF)


Real Clear Markets: Cape Wind - An unsightly monument to political pull

Playing out in Massachusetts is a saga in which a private developer is using his political connections to trump the interests of state electric ratepayers - and in the process creating a precedent for much broader misuse of governmental power. The saga involves a court case in which state officials invoked an arcane provision of the U.S. Constitution to deny aggrieved ratepayers access to federal court. It provides a study of the tactics to which government will resort in order shore up a green energy project for which there can be little, if any, justification on either environmental or economic grounds.

Read the entire article over at RealClearMarkets.com.

More on Wind Energy:
CapeCod.com Interview: The economics of Cape Wind
Boston Herald: David Tuerck on Cape Wind's dubious legal logic


FaxSheet: How much is that construction project on the Pike costing us?

Stuck in traffic on the Massachusetts Turnpike last month, Boston Business Journal Editor George Donnelly calculated a back-of-the-envelope estimate of the economic losses commuters can expect during a two-year construction project now underway on the last leg of the roadway near Boston. Donnelly found that the “Mass Pike-pocalypse” -- the cumulative effect of getting stuck in traffic for 20 minutes a day -- could cost the state economy approximately $269 million over the two-year project. Long-term benefits of reconstruction aside, that’s a huge amount of money that could have been saved with more effective planning by state transportation officials. The Institute comes up with its own estimate. Read more here.


BHI STAMP measures up Illinois renewable policy:

Study: Illinois's renewable policy no help to state economy

(Boston, MA) Closing so-called loopholes in Illinois’s mandated use of renewable energy program, in an effort to expand ‘green’ industries, will harm the state’s economy, according to a study from The Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University in Boston.

Illinois requires that its major utilities obtain 25 percent of their electricity sales from renewable sources by the year 2026, but the ability of customers to choose other providers has undermined the intent of the law. Nevertheless, the targets as presently constituted have the effect of dramatically raising the cost of energy for Illinois citizens, which affects consumers’ ability to meet their other financial obligations. According to the Institute’s analysis, Illinois businesses and residents will pay an additional $4.5 billion for electricity from 2014 to 2026 because of the Renewable Portfolio Standard. More

Press Release: PDF

Complete Study, “The Economic Impact of Illinois's Renewable Portfolio Standard” (PDF)


Response to the Instititute on Taxation and Economic Policy Critique of the BHI STAMP

ITEP's flawed critique of BHI STAMP:

On May 21, 2014, The Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) released a report entitled, “STAMP is an Unsound Tool for Gauging the Economic Impact of Taxes.” The report makes several criticisms of the Beacon Hill Institute (BHI) State Tax Analysis Modeling Program (STAMP®).

BHI responds to the criticisms contained in the Executive Summary of the report. (PDF)


Response to Critique of BHI's Renewable Portfolio Standards studies

An Appeal to Facts in a “Fact Check”

In their attempt to defend subsidies for green energy, supporters rely on Keynesian arguments to promote policies that will provide much-needed spending in an economy. The assumptions made by advocacy organizations such as the Union of Concerned Scientists are likely to hold only in the short run, if at all. Other arguments often made by critics of BHI's RPS studies have failed repeatedly to address the underlying basics of economics. Ultimately, while BHI sets out to soundly operationalize the true costs and benefits of projects like wind energy, green energy advocates fail to adequately put the relevant numbers to their claims. Read A Response to the Union of Concerned Scientists Critique of BHI’s Renewable Portfolio Studies


Search beaconhill.org

 

 

 

 
HeadingsWeb62004whatsnew1.gif

THE LATEST

Over at NCPA:
BHI on the merits of dynamic scoring

Massachusetts State Revenue Forecasts for FY15 and FY16

ON THE ECONOMY
BHI Statement on U.S. Employment Situation
March 2015: 5.5%

IN THE MEDIA
Boston Herald: David Tuerck on Jonathan Gruber

Wisconsin: Can State Pull Its Punches?
New tax policy needed to help Wisconsin prosper: A BHI Study

BHI economists Paul Bachman and David Tuerck cited by WalletHub

BHI Studies on State Renewable Portfolio Standards

From the Archives
What critics of the STAMP model get wrong

What is STAMP? A Primer

A Response to the Union of Concerned Scientists Critique of BHI’s Renewable Portfolio Studies

Why the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy's Critique of STAMP is dead wrong. PDF

Feed2
Subscribe to RSS FEED

Facebook-Logo


OTHER RESEARCH TOPICS


SEARCH

 
 

BottomfooterBHI.gif MailtoHotSpot

SiteMap